<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Daniel Hall&#039;s Website</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.danielhall.me/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.danielhall.me</link>
	<description>Because the Internet doesn&#039;t have enough opinions already</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 12:10:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on mod_pagespeed is not (always) the answer by Joshua Marantz</title>
		<link>http://www.danielhall.me/2011/04/mod_pagespeed-is-not-always-the-answer/comment-page-1/#comment-14771</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Marantz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 12:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danielhall.me/?p=676#comment-14771</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the blog-post, Daniel.  There are two points you made I want to comment on:

1. Converting images to data-urls is hard to do by hand because not all browsers support data-urls.  In other cases the decision about whether that conversion is a win or not is dependent on the browser, the connection speed, and other dynamic aspects.  These are very hard to change statically.

2. You raise a concern that javascript minification should not be done in the server.  The way you phrased it implies that the minification must take place every time the page is served.  This is not the case.  mod_pagespeed caches the optimized versions of resources that it creates.  As long as the origin javascript is not updated, mod_pagespeed will not need to recompute the optimization; it will serve the resources from cache.


However, you make a very good point that the best practices we&#039;ve automated with mod_pagespeed are not optimized for a particular site.  We recommend using http://webpagetest.org to measure the site speed with and without mod_pagespeed, and to help you tune the mod_pagespeed options.  Be sure to run large numbers of iterations, both first &amp; repeat view, because many sites exhibit a wide variance in performance.  10 is the maximum number you can do at once.

Also see Page Speed online, http://pagespeed.googlelabs.com/, which gives you very rapid feedback as to what can be improved on your site.  Many of the recommendations it offers are done automatically by mod_pagespeed, some must still be done manually.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the blog-post, Daniel.  There are two points you made I want to comment on:</p>
<p>1. Converting images to data-urls is hard to do by hand because not all browsers support data-urls.  In other cases the decision about whether that conversion is a win or not is dependent on the browser, the connection speed, and other dynamic aspects.  These are very hard to change statically.</p>
<p>2. You raise a concern that javascript minification should not be done in the server.  The way you phrased it implies that the minification must take place every time the page is served.  This is not the case.  mod_pagespeed caches the optimized versions of resources that it creates.  As long as the origin javascript is not updated, mod_pagespeed will not need to recompute the optimization; it will serve the resources from cache.</p>
<p>However, you make a very good point that the best practices we&#8217;ve automated with mod_pagespeed are not optimized for a particular site.  We recommend using <a href="http://webpagetest.org" rel="nofollow">http://webpagetest.org</a> to measure the site speed with and without mod_pagespeed, and to help you tune the mod_pagespeed options.  Be sure to run large numbers of iterations, both first &amp; repeat view, because many sites exhibit a wide variance in performance.  10 is the maximum number you can do at once.</p>
<p>Also see Page Speed online, <a href="http://pagespeed.googlelabs.com/" rel="nofollow">http://pagespeed.googlelabs.com/</a>, which gives you very rapid feedback as to what can be improved on your site.  Many of the recommendations it offers are done automatically by mod_pagespeed, some must still be done manually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Writing a Daemon in C by agsavi</title>
		<link>http://www.danielhall.me/2010/01/writing-a-daemon-in-c/comment-page-1/#comment-5576</link>
		<dc:creator>agsavi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jan 2011 12:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danielhall.me/?p=466#comment-5576</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the post. It was helpful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the post. It was helpful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rebooting with &#8216;The Big Hammer&#8217; by Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.danielhall.me/2010/12/rebooting-with-the-big-hammer/comment-page-1/#comment-4485</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Dec 2010 10:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danielhall.me/?p=670#comment-4485</guid>
		<description>@chris Normally yes, but in the light of many many disk errors I preferred to have the machine simply reboot. Plus everything had already become read only at that point anyway. I&#039;m not yet sure if the machine (and the data) is cool, but luckily I have backups. :)

@Alex there is all kinds of cool stuff in procfs, I should write a post about the best bits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@chris Normally yes, but in the light of many many disk errors I preferred to have the machine simply reboot. Plus everything had already become read only at that point anyway. I&#8217;m not yet sure if the machine (and the data) is cool, but luckily I have backups. <img src='http://www.danielhall.me/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>@Alex there is all kinds of cool stuff in procfs, I should write a post about the best bits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rebooting with &#8216;The Big Hammer&#8217; by Alex Peters</title>
		<link>http://www.danielhall.me/2010/12/rebooting-with-the-big-hammer/comment-page-1/#comment-4468</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Peters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Dec 2010 05:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danielhall.me/?p=670#comment-4468</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t believe that this stuff has a &lt;code&gt;procfs&lt;/code&gt; interface!  That&#039;s totally awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe that this stuff has a <code>procfs</code> interface!  That&#8217;s totally awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Protecting Email with DKIM by Chris Samuel</title>
		<link>http://www.danielhall.me/2010/07/protecting-email-with-dkim/comment-page-1/#comment-4460</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Samuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Dec 2010 01:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danielhall.me/?p=629#comment-4460</guid>
		<description>Nah, no need, I&#039;ve not had to touch sendmail since the mid-90&#039;s now, I&#039;ve used Smail, Qmail and Postfix since then..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nah, no need, I&#8217;ve not had to touch sendmail since the mid-90&#8242;s now, I&#8217;ve used Smail, Qmail and Postfix since then..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rebooting with &#8216;The Big Hammer&#8217; by Chris Samuel</title>
		<link>http://www.danielhall.me/2010/12/rebooting-with-the-big-hammer/comment-page-1/#comment-4459</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Samuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Dec 2010 01:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danielhall.me/?p=670#comment-4459</guid>
		<description>Hiya Daniel,

Before sending the &#039;b&#039; it is always worth sending &#039;s&#039;, &#039;u&#039; and &#039;s&#039; again - force a sync, remount all FS&#039;s r/o and then sync again.

Best of luck with resurrecting the box!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hiya Daniel,</p>
<p>Before sending the &#8216;b&#8217; it is always worth sending &#8216;s&#8217;, &#8216;u&#8217; and &#8216;s&#8217; again &#8211; force a sync, remount all FS&#8217;s r/o and then sync again.</p>
<p>Best of luck with resurrecting the box!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Protecting Email with DKIM by Mujtaba Hussain</title>
		<link>http://www.danielhall.me/2010/07/protecting-email-with-dkim/comment-page-1/#comment-3632</link>
		<dc:creator>Mujtaba Hussain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 11:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danielhall.me/?p=629#comment-3632</guid>
		<description>Do I still have to put up with sendmail in this era? :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do I still have to put up with sendmail in this era? <img src='http://www.danielhall.me/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google&#8217;s Privacy Bungle by Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.danielhall.me/2010/06/googles-privacy-bungle/comment-page-1/#comment-2381</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 12:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danielhall.me/?p=621#comment-2381</guid>
		<description>Its not Facebook I am critisizing, its the people who complain about privacy and then go and put all their data on Facebook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its not Facebook I am critisizing, its the people who complain about privacy and then go and put all their data on Facebook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google&#8217;s Privacy Bungle by Mujtaba Hussain</title>
		<link>http://www.danielhall.me/2010/06/googles-privacy-bungle/comment-page-1/#comment-2369</link>
		<dc:creator>Mujtaba Hussain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 09:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danielhall.me/?p=621#comment-2369</guid>
		<description>I agree with you. Google should not be liable for capturing it. It is a past time now a days to blame your technical incompetence on the technical competence of others. 

Mujtaba Hussain

p.s. You too, my friend, are on facebook, so don&#039;t rush to criticise it :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you. Google should not be liable for capturing it. It is a past time now a days to blame your technical incompetence on the technical competence of others. </p>
<p>Mujtaba Hussain</p>
<p>p.s. You too, my friend, are on facebook, so don&#8217;t rush to criticise it <img src='http://www.danielhall.me/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cross-Domain AJAX by Alex Peters</title>
		<link>http://www.danielhall.me/2010/05/cross-domain-ajax/comment-page-1/#comment-1437</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Peters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 01:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danielhall.me/?p=499#comment-1437</guid>
		<description>Consider also &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JSON#JSONP&quot; title=&quot;Wikipedia: JSON: JSONP&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;JSONP&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consider also <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JSON#JSONP" title="Wikipedia: JSON: JSONP" rel="nofollow">JSONP</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

